In some countries, it is possible for people to have a variety of food that has been transported from all over the world. To what extent do you think its benefits outweigh the drawbacks?
Nowadays, along with improving both the quality and quantity kind of inland food, importing these kinds of food from other countries is also becoming a prevalent trend in certain regions. Notwithstanding all the advantages of receiving food from all over the world, it has eleventy drawbacks which should be considered in these countries to protect the local food.
There are some compelling benefits of importing food from other countries. Firstly, there is some food which is grown or produced in certain places or specific climate. Therefore, in terms of individuals, importing food gives people chances to try some new and strange fruits, vegetables, and some other beverages, …Thanks to try some new kinds of food, people can improve their knowledge and understanding about different cultures from different societies. Moreover, in terms of their own country, it helps them enhance and knit economic relationships with foreign cultures.
In spite of the above-mentioned advantages, it can be said that paying money for importing food does more harm than good. Because of long distances, we could ensure food quality and conditions, which can be mitigated after the transporting period. Moreover, some people are more likely to consume foreign food to show their life standard or taste something which is strange for them. Imported food will take gradually all market share, which acts as a precursor of reducing the expenditure of inland food, a major contributor to some difficulties of the local economy.
In conclusion, although I am convinced that it is really great if some countries have a variety of food transported from all over the world, they should take some consideration the extent of importing to avoid creating disadvantages for local food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thanks
... vegetables, and some other beverages, …Thanks to try some new kinds of food, people c...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, in conclusion, kind of, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31785714286 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90785135277 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560714285714 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7411051942 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.363636364 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311447586992 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126317929933 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946683524112 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216146608085 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809285240245 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.