In some countries, the number of shootings increase because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Globally, many people own guns for self-defense and property protection, and guns is an essential and sacred thing, number of moralities in households is increasing daily. That’s why, the person is at a risk being shot if there is a gun in a house.
Guns at home is so danger for teenagers and children. Since they are not mature and don’t have the exact knowledge what might the gun cause to him/ her or around. However, when a child sees any gun at home unconsciously, he/she will try to use, play with it like any movie the watched on the television. For example, around 150 American children die each because of fault gun shooting at home.
On the other hand, male face sometime violent arguments at his house with their spouse, therefore they believe that gun is important at home to protect his honor and reputation. Moreover, cultures oblige people to hold guns especially in poor areas, where drug dealers and human traffickers take advantage in such places. For example, due to jealousy on his wife, man can kill her without thinking twice if there is a household gun.
As a conclusion, guns at home for some is important and essential, while for others is a big risk on family members especially children and teenagers. For my point of view, I disagree with the idea of having household gun, where governments should prevent shops from selling guns and exclusively be for police and army use only, and in this way number of shooting will decrease.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77647058824 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61761107414 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643137254902 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7232032897 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.727272727 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231291268235 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944534845853 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381348519111 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146024562532 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337549435652 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.