Many people in several countries tend to have a house ownership than living in rented house. It is not arguable that buying a house will give a guarantee for the future life. However, it will be a negative situation, especially the young generations, because the land that able to be built as a housing complex will be decreased year after year.
There are several reason to explain this negative situation. Firstly, the problem of land ownership that dominated by the corporate sector. It will become a hurdle because their land will not be converted to a housing area. In metropolitan area, they will turn their land to business center, while in suburban or rural area, the land will be turned into plantations, factories, or even mining area. Instead of provides the people needs for housing, it will become a conflict between the corporation and people.
Secondly, there is no guarantee that the young generations will have same access as their parents to gaining their private house. This could be happened because, in some countries, there is no policy that addressed this specific housing problem that faced by the young generations. The policy or legislation that provided by the government did not provide the long term solution for the housing problems. For example, in several countries, they only ruled about the housing tax system or to give the differences between public and private ownerships.
In conclusion, I agreed that having a house become a vital goal for almost people in the world. However, as the access to having a house decreased, it will be humble if we considered to renting a house so it will minimize another problem in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
...decreased year after year. There are several reason to explain this negative situation. Fir...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.975 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65633388223 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510714285714 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9058434219 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136124554819 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577523155247 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496718818431 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913410341537 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245667940054 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.