In some countries, some of criminal in the law courts are show on the television, so that the general public can watch them.
Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
There are some countries, such as the US, where court cases are televised, so that the public can view them. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of the trial of the criminal court on Internet platform or television. First, government always broadcast the cases or crimes about their work widely across the media regardless of their background. This broadcast support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall protection people avoid criminal but also efficient and fair trials will be ensured, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Second, criminal court cases are television would probably result judge or lawyer are work honestly, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that loyal and protection human capital is imperative to foster their admit for their mistake and people will not angry with government because when have any people have mistake about law are pay for price.
However, the trial of the criminal court are televised still have disadvantages. First, criminal court will have on Internet would likely correspond with attack of the criminal’s family. By using technological devices such as mobile phone and tablets, nowadays people, especially, children, are now able to keep in touch with their family or friend, following newsletter regardless geographical distance. This is synonymous with crime images because when children are a witness or victims will always obsessed about crime and if government always have criminal court on television will make the victims hard to forgot about the incident and haunt it for life. Second, criminal picture or case on Internet would tempt many young children including those who are have criminal inclined or show interesting about break the law, thereby adding great burdens for government and government staff and potentially have trend following mistake of criminal. Meanwhile, young people could have spent pursuing more suitable program. It, instead, would be a more program viable option if the resources were focused about protecting people or know face’s criminal and people avoid dangerous.
I was discussed both sides of the argument. In my perspective, this argument have advantages outweigh disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 794, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'mistaken'.
Suggestion: mistaken
...nment because when have any people have mistake about law are pay for price. However, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'obsess'
Suggestion: obsess
...en are a witness or victims will always obsessed about crime and if government always ha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 753, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...mpt many young children including those who are have criminal inclined or show interest...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 761, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
... young children including those who are have criminal inclined or show interesting a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, honestly, however, if, second, so, still, while, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45555555556 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69601328897 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.0996489242 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.75 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175185956497 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665073336573 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076182796756 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116273778617 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514150370398 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.