Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in publicbuildings such as offices and restaurants. What are the advantages anddisadvantages?

Essay topics:

Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public
buildings such as offices and restaurants. What are the advantages and
disadvantages?

The harmful effects of smoking have been widely known nowadays. And, a law has been adopted by some countries to prohibit people smoking in public places such as offices and restaurants. Despite some benefits from that, there might be some possible drawbacks which I will explain below.
Regarding the benefits, it appears that policy might reduce the number of tobacco victims: second-hand smoke. As we see when active smokers smoked freely in public areas, the various poisons and chemicals that are produced by cigarettes, undoubtedly, would be inhaled not only by smokers but also non-smokers, in which that is harmful for human life. Thus, adopting a no-smoking policy, probably heavy smokers might no longer smoke in public buildings because they have been conscious of threatened penalty. Furthermore, It seems that smoking bans might improve work productivity in workplaces. If smoking were not allowed in workplaces, people could focus on their work because the safety and health environment are created.
Moving to drawbacks, It is apparent that banning smoking in public places could affect to the lesser of tax revenue for the government. For instance, In Indonesia, the highest taxes comes from tobacco manufacturers. Hence, when the country applied that policy, the cigarette demand would incline significantly. In addition, smoke-free laws might impact tobacco farmers, in which they perhaps would incur losses, because tobacco demand could reduce as well as cigarette demand.
Taking everything into account, Although there some drawbacks in terms of economy aspect, there are also some possible benefits which are healthy life and work productivity.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, regarding, second, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49805447471 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68305360845 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614785992218 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.03176161 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.692307692 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214760653625 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792274867425 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708125421697 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133511291309 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784129993614 0.056905535591 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.