Some educators believe that international school exchange visits are important for teenage children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely believed that education is not the only way but the fastest path to reach the 'success' destination. Recently, foreign exchange visit programmes have been introduced into the schooling system by educators who consider that students would benefit a great deal from this project as they strive for success. In this essay, I will throw the light on both perspectives as although I agree with this opinion, I believe this brings both drawbacks and benefits to teenagers.
On the one hand, it is a common belief that the international school exchange visits bring numerous merits to juveniles. The main reason behind this notion is that pupils can meet different people and learn a range of skills such as teamwork, communication, cultural acquisition from them. These interaction opportunities make students capable of developing social experiences and get a deeper insight into national culture. Moreover, living far away without depending on parents for daily lives, students will become more self-reliant since each individual ought to learn how to cook, clean, manage objects and even make their own decisions. This will subject teenagers to learning how to tolerate the differences and self-boost their confidence. [good]
On the other hand, it is cogent that every coin has two sides and the same is true here.[nice] The first drawback of this foreign curriculum is culture shock. After facing unfamiliar customs and different beliefs, juveniles can be led to misunderstanding, tension and the worst is conflicts. Then, they find it difficult to concentrate on their studies and may be disoriented or homesick. In addition to these emotional stress, studying in an unfamiliar environment can be challenging for students who will face language barriers, and get overwhelmed by difficult workloads. This might destroy the students’ eagerness to learn and curiosity to explore the host countries, which means opposite to the original goal of doing cultural exchange. Hence, the cost of these programmes are too expensive for students in underdeveloped countries to afford it. [good]
To sum up, I wholeheartedly agree with this statement because it becomes crystal clear that by successfully overcoming those disadvantages, this studying travels offer numerous benefits to teenage children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-13 | watermelon.linh | 95 | view |
- Throughout history people have dreamed of living in a perfect society but they have not agreed on what an ideal society would be like What do you think is the most important element of a perfect society in the modern world How can people work towards achi 61
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourism industries Why is this the case Is it a positive development 84
- In some cultures older people are valued most highly In other cultures youth is valued more than experience Discuss both views and give your opinion as to which age should be most valued 78
- Many People Think That Happiness Relies On The Responsibility Of Individuals Others Think It Is Affected By Other Factors Discuss both views and state your opinion by using examples from your personal experience 67
- The only reason to work hard is to earn money To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, then, in addition, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4469273743 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0053321734 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639664804469 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4543899825 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138705483518 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444206393934 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495353677595 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845731143582 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405098626642 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.