Some employers believe that job applicants’ social skills are more important than their academic qualifications.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that enroll a job, social skills are more significant than their academic qualifications. This essay will examine both sides of the arguments before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of social skills are more important than academic when job applicants. First, government subsidies for working are believed to equalize job opportunities among young adolescents regardless of their academic background. This social skills support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall employer enrollment rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Second, social skills are more important would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant than the minor benefits once social skills more important than academic qualifications. First, enroll all people about social skills would likely correspond with a tremendous strain on a country. Generating no income from contract because they don’t have academic qualifications and don’t know the principal of work, company could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, social skills are more important than academic when apply a job would tempt many young people including those who are not academically inclined or show no interest in working pursuits, thereby adding great burdens for company admissions and enrollment staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing more suitable career paths. It, instead, would be a more apply viable option if the resources were focused on supporting less privileged yet gifted people.
In conclusion, in this life, academic become an important of companies. Personally, I hold positive attitude towards increased better employer in terms of global social matters and cultural exchange, however, we should be alert to the potential risk of this trend.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71264367816 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91571384697 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.0777094389 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335469652813 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127460863438 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107870214918 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209280506405 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775064616965 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.