Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribute to the company by giving them extra money. This practical can act as an incentive for some but may be also have a negative impact on others.
To what extend is this style of management effective?
Are better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
It is true that employee’s endeavor for their company should be recognized with money. However, this way also has negative effects on other staffs. My essay will dig deeper into this topic and gives some suggestions to improve management’s means.
To begin, there are two reasons why giving extra money is a straightforward way to increase employee’s productivity. Obviously, everyone joins in the work because of salary to maintain their lives and take care of their family. They dig into working to save money for their child’s tuition, doctor’s bills, subsistence expenses, etc….So the more money they earn, the more difficulties are eased. By this way, when employee’s life is assured, they will pay more attention in their work. Alternatively, it is difficult for employers to give something to their staffs as a reward because of their lack of understanding about what they really need. For instance, one company has policy that they will give to a high-qualified employee three pairs of shoes which he and his colleagues are producing. Meanwhile, right now, he needs money to pay for his monthly gale. In short, money is far more practical than others.
Despite these reasons mentioned above, money is not the best way to encourage working’s spirit, even it has negative effects on other staffs. In fact, the reward is always limited, and often given to the greatest one. Because of that, the others think they would never reach it, and then, they do not attempt or feel bored with their work. And certainly, the production as well as management is not effective.
In my opinion, the success of company depends on all of the members. So instead of an individual person, the employers should reward all as a team with money. To illustrate, in one team has a man who has an amazing idea to improve quality of product. The money will be divided to two parts, 60% for him and 40% for the others in this team. It is believed that this method could boost company’s sales as well as teamwork’s spirit amongst colleagues.
In conclusion, giving money to employees as a reward contains both advantages and disadvantages to every company. However, this is still useful way to encourage the staffs. I believed that it will be true, if we apply it properly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 335, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...tor’s bills, subsistence expenses, etc….So the more money they earn, the more diff...
^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as well as management is not effective. In my opinion, the success of company de...
^^^
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...nion, the success of company depends on all of the members. So instead of an individual pe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, really, so, still, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in short, as well as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93489583333 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79779018818 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549479166667 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6950631085 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3913043478 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6956521739 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17391304348 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320011430631 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864839428266 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557800449541 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178951751297 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778119182705 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.