Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this overweigh its disadvantages

Essay topics:

Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this overweigh its disadvantages?

In the contemporary era, since the globalization becomes trendy in the world, foreign language competence has been accentuated as an indispensable requirement for every individual. It has been argued that youngsters had better commence acquiring a new language at elementary school rather than senior high school. In my vantage point, I consider this outlook to have both productive and adverse aspects.
To begin with, in primary level, pupils learn new things more quickly and have a long lasting memory. Many researchers have advocated that the age between 4 and 8 is the best period to gain new knowledge; thus, primary level is the most ideal period to get exposed to different languages. Furthermore, approaching new language upgrades juveniles’ cognitive competence and enables them to enhance their language wellness. Consequently, it lays the basis for pupils’ success in the higher grade, hence children will have dominance over other counterparts in studying and performing as well.
Beneficial as this trend is, it is worth contemplating that there are some adversities. In this age, the kids have to learn their mother tongue. In fact, most of first-grade pupils are usually busy practicing spelling and hand-writing just for learning a letter in alphabetical system. Approaching new language too soon may put extra burden on students which prompt them to be overloaded. Besides that, giving prominence to language acquisition, children have less chances to engage in outdoor activities, so being in the verge of inadequate of societal experience is what children face up with.
In brief, although learning a foreign language early may leave a few adverse impacts, it still has some propitious advantages. I strongly assert that the utilities overweigh its harms.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... to language acquisition, children have less chances to engage in outdoor activities...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, so, still, thus, well, in brief, in fact, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42446043165 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00986078465 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669064748201 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3541618818 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267377263668 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078071890552 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576087251199 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149129445718 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487477422306 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.