Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language in primary school rather than secondary school. D o the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages.
Bilingual learning especially foreign languagae has been rising recently. Some may consider that, it is better to learn from preliminary classes rather than secondary level. However, the main benefit of early learning that easy grasping, able to built a strong linguistic foundation would be overcome the drawbacks like confusion, and difficulties of teaching huge subjects.
Primary school students has more inquisitive nature than the teenagers for studying different things to some extent. For the basic of foreign language during the starting age of school may help the students to understand and use it for later preciously. Moreover, the proper knowledge regarding other language from the beginning may lead to improve mother tongue and outside language together to the core. For example, countries like India, students from English medium emphasize more understanding of English literatures and movies than local medium who teaches English in secondary school.
Teaching innovative things in teenage may alter the grasping power and enhancing doubts and fear of such subjects. Especially, students from secondary school depicts, more tedious and lazy to study new language than the toddlers. Make use of subjects including ingenious language exposure may lead to severe confusion and inability to catch teaching things properly. Furthermore, secondary students have had more subjects like science, geography and social. In that, students may devoid of languages and put more concentration towards such academic syllabus.
To conclude, learning other languages early in the school period flourish the basements of language and better understanding than secondary students. Such spectacular advances overcome the minor disadvantages in language studies.
- The diagram below show the changes that have taken place in west Park secondary school since it s construction in 1950 44
- The bar chart below shows transport preferences among young people in four countries in a single year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Because many children are not able to learn foreign languages schools should not force them to learn foreign languages To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Online, people write opinions and reviews of services. Is it a good thing or bad thing.? 11
- The trend of increased consumer goods production is damaging the natural environment. Why is it still happening? What are the solutions for this situation? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'considers'.
Suggestion: considers
...agae has been rising recently. Some may consider that, it is better to learn from prelim...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...awbacks like confusion, and difficulties of teaching huge subjects. Primary sch...
^^
Line 4, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the core. For example, countries like India, students from English medium emph...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86821705426 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78583771482 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577519379845 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5058004896 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.142857143 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297530279955 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106320242064 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854752958764 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187470052887 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618917998039 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.