to some extent does the internet increase social cohesion?
As the world becomes more integrated, using the Internet is becoming more popular in both developed and developing countries. Some people think that the more widely-used Internet is, the more isolated society is. However, I argue that the Internet can affect family, friends, and colleagues in both good and bad ways.
Firstly, the Internet has the potential to diminish family life, but also enhance it. It helps members in a family stay in touch with each other. It is particularly true for foreign students who want to call their families without too expensive tax. However, couples are easily addicted to online gaming or other online activities. This leads to children's ignorance and carelessness or even a bad example.
Secondly, the Internet can distract people from friends, but it also helps people to keep and make friends. For example, it is possible for an injured person stuck at home to use the internet to keep in touch with his friends. Evenly, people can meet friends through social networking. In contrast, shy teens who are always surfing the Internet may lose their social skills or be taken advantage of by their friends they have never met.
Similarly, the Internet robs workers' time for face- to- face meeting; however, it can also make it easier to work together. Instead of going out for a meeting, workers tend to read emails all day. Using too much computer may make people less active. However, the Internet brings several advantages to workers. For instance, emails and instant messaging are more useful than phoning for collaboration. Moreover, the Internet allows workers to work from a far distance in case they cannot go to the office.
To sum up, the Internet can make our life better or worse. If used appropriately, it can create more togetherness than we thought.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Neferti | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-14 | Yvienne Magnolia | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-02 | Candy123 | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, for example, for instance, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00332225914 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57300766198 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4618121073 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.3 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.05 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129614641924 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395443821859 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353249928755 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700695004007 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343667170493 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.