Some governments spend a lot of public money training up individuals to be successful in international sporting events. Some people believe that this money should be spent on things that will benefit the general public instead.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many countries accumulate public money for the practice and grooming of players to participate sports events conducted globally. While, others argued that consume such money for the development of nation and common people. However, in this essay agree with the statement such as, more than many people who suffer from illiteracy, unemployment, road and traffic congestion and so on. Thereby, government should spend money for the public and arrange sponsorship program for players.
Initially, government has plethora of things and progress to do for the community and environment. Many people still suffering the issues poor village development with road and traffic deterioration's, lack of jobs for youth, poor educational system and so on. Budget money for such problems and enhance the overall development than certain areas like sports practices. For instance happened in India that a famous athlete who win national games by proper training and her life standard of family emphasize the other side of reality such as, under nourished siblings and illiterate parents.
Nevertheless, stimulate talented sporty individual need indispensable support from society and government. Owing to the fact that, authorities should search for appropriate sponsorship entrepreneurs, club members to flourish the inborn ability of every sports men and women. Rather get ride of public essentials for treating players would make detrimental effect on the community though, conducting sports events to promote officials to become energetic and powerful. For example, team cricket organised program for the enhancement of players sportsman spirit and inhibited talented by 20-20 cricket play nationally. Moreover, many clubs are choosing players to play for their team and giving chances for promotion.
To sum up, government cannot wash their hands from sports players and their growth, even though, to search for sponsors, lion club members for recruiting and training players would be best than spending public money for individual and group sports item participants.
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 76
- The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experi 73
- Most people try to balance between work and other part of lives Unfortunately not many achieve this delicate balance What are the main problems people are facing What is the best way to overcome them 93
- Pollution and other environmental problems are resulting from the way that many countries are developing and becoming richer Some think this cannot be avoided To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c money for the practice and grooming of players to participate sports events con...
^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lems and enhance the overall development than certain areas like sports practices...
^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
... ability of every sports men and women. Rather get ride of public essentials for treat...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, while, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68932038835 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80097788471 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601941747573 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5547288811 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.571428571 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155486348307 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618287727702 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552796937578 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115070646527 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585265571691 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.