In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city center, in policy to reduce the number of cars in the city. Give reasons in support of and opposing this policy, and give your own opinion.
There is a huge number of cars have been sold every year all around the world. To digest that situation, some large cities issue the policy to reduce the number of cars in the city center by taking a fee once entered into the city. I am totally on the supportive side but this policy also has some opposite side, this essay will discuss both.
On the supportive side, decrease the number of cars in the city benefits both citizens and the government. Firstly, fewer private cars mean the carbon dioxide can be reduced noticeably. The carbon dioxide released from cars is very harmful to the city - where lots of citizens living. Therefore, taking a fee for each entry is a good way to lessen cars go into the city. Besides that, the fee in which drivers are purchased can be used to refurbish the infrastructure every year. For instance, if we have that fee, the governments no longer have to spend a large investment in repairing roads and bridges. For those two strong reasons, the policy is supportive.
On the other hand, lessening cars in the city may occur some problems too. Difficulty in getting a taxi or private car is the first thing to concern. Many young people tend to use taxies several times a week for going out or just the necessity of politeness when going to serious places. Moreover, reducing cars in the city is often synonymous with the busy of stations. More people may use public transportation, make stations become crowded places - where robbers can get easy to thief from citizens. With two persuasive ideas, it is clear that the policy also has some drawbacks.
All in all, everything always has two opposite sides: the positive and the negative. In a supportive way, fewer cars seem to be clean the environment and help the government with repair later but it may create difficulty for citizens in getting a private car for serious situations and the government to eliminate social evils. In my opinion, save our health from air pollution must be a top concentration nowadays.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a supportive way" with adverb for "supportive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e sides: the positive and the negative. In a supportive way, fewer cars seem to be clean the enviro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76571428571 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56554067731 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565714285714 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6569323681 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7894736842 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349139962057 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104772428698 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947772655513 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222261163783 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116636420817 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.