Historical objects often can tell a lot about the period when they were created. Nowadays, public museums and art galleries provide the public with the opportunity to learn history by examining historical objects and learning about them. However, some people consider this practice outdated since it is possible to find these artefacts online. Although the internet does provide a lot of information about such items, I believe that museums and galleries give a better picture.
Generally, there are some details which are conveyed only through physical inspection and can be missed in digital form. For instance, technical limits of computer pictures like resolution or quality often hide important details. As a result, computers do not provide the right perception for a proper inspection. Therefore, although it might appear to be the same artefacts, their value is decreased.
Furthermore, public museums and art galleries play an essential role in maintaining the culture of the nation. It is undeniable that museums and art galleries give a sustainable growth of a country as well as enhance public appreciation of art and history. For example, many people are unable to understand the importance of paintings like Vincent van Gogh’s collections before they see them themselves. Consequently, society becomes more aware of their own culture and history. Moreover, they also serve as tourist attractions which can contribute to the economy.
In conclusion, despite technology making studying history or art more accessible and convenient, public museums and art galleries provide more details and so raise the public's cultural self-awareness. In this manner, I believe that computers will not substitute going to these places.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5393258427 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90208766381 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610486891386 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6907608577 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127799374545 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402138926016 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379289092051 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757788186184 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145837452637 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.