Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees, while others have free entry.
Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages?
It is argued that museums and art galleries should collect money from selling tickets to visitors. This essay will outline that the merits of charging the individuals who want to enter the facilities outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, collecting entrance fee from visitors can help the development of the museums and art galleries. The main reason is that the maintenance and expansion of the organizations cost tremendous money as the revenue of admission is one of the most important and stable cash flow for funding. In addition, there are some people who regard museums are just the free places with air-conditioner to spend all day there, doesn’t be really interested in the exhibition and might disturb other visitors. Therefore, it is necessary to manage the number of this kind of visitors by avoiding free entry policy.
On the other hand, the main drawback of charging admission fee is that it might reduce the number of citizens, such as students or teenagers, who have less income. However, this could be avoided by price discrimination. For instance, it can offer specific discount to individuals who offer their student card or provide ID card to prove they are less than 22 years old in the ticket stand.
In conclusion, I believe that the benefit of collecting admission fee, in terms of maintenance and management of unwelcome guests, outweighs the downsides. Additionally, the drawback of reduction of needed visitors such as students and teenager can be avoided by offering price discrimination policy
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (ID) must be used with a third-person verb: 'cards'.
Suggestion: cards
... offer their student card or provide ID card to prove they are less than 22 years ol...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, really, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.176 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93557490111 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5087254048 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.636363636 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196286164612 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663517951105 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485948446323 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111569205759 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031883059376 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.