In some organizations, promotions are based on seniority, while in other organizations, promotions are based on performance. Discuss the advantages of each position. Then indicate which position you think is best and why.

Essay topics:

In some organizations, promotions are based on seniority, while in other organizations, promotions are based on performance. Discuss the advantages of each position. Then indicate which position you think is best and why.

In numerous organisations, the promotions will be bestowed to employer based on seniority, nevertheless, others organisations, performance has become the standard of determining any promotions. In accordance with this statement, this essay will explain the benefit of each argument and also put forward my perspective in the following paragraphs.

To begin with, several organisations which render promotions based on experiences assume that it is going to produce upsides such as appreciating the individuals who have worked for a long time. They, furthermore, do believe that by conferring it is capable of inspiring the newest employer to obtain the similar award as their senior received by working as proper as the experienced employer. However, the other organisations contemplate that rendering promotion for all workers who have excellent performance is necessary to be done in order to create an equal opportunity for all sides and do not make any employs to be envious due to an unfair promotion.

In regard to my point of view, I personally appreciate to organisations which bestow the promotion based on the length of the work's time. Nonetheless, I tend to believe that it is going to generate unfavourable impact ultimately such as making junior employer feeling unappreciated. Therefore, I prefer to think that the other organisations assumptions are better to be produced due to the fact that it will create an improved influence for all sides.

By way of conclusion, it seems to me that providing promotions based on performance are absolutely pivotal to be done for making an equal possibility and being fair for all persons. Thus, in order to make it happen, all organisations are supposed to do this scheme.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, such as, in regard to, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28985507246 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25222687187 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550724637681 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.264113821 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137490927093 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596463179733 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551451367479 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926580619508 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201919674092 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.