Some parents think that they can take advantage of modern technology to educate their children at home. Others argue that the learning process can only be facilitated with the appearance of teachers. Which opinion are you in favour of? Why? You should write at least 250 words.
There is an opinion that mothers and fathers can make full use of day-to-day technology to teach their kids from the comfort of their own home, while some argue that the process of retaining knowledge can only be promoted with the help of teachers. Personally, I agree with the latter school of thought for a number of reasons.
Granted, one might argue that children can be educated by their parents at home. This is predicated on the assumption that thanks to the availability of the Internet, parents can download helpful materials to guide their offsprings’ learning process. While this may be true to a certain extent, it should be remembered that not all parents are well-versed in pedagogical skills or in-depth knowledge about particular subjects. In fact, some of then even cannot differentiate between reliable and misleading sources, or simply sift information to marshal their facts. Therefore, it is reasonable to say that having kids educated by their moms and dads at home with the help of modern technology is an unwise choice.
To add further credence to my assertion, I note that the process of knowledge acquisition can only be achieved with the presence of teachers. This is chiefly because as teachers have been trained in their professions for many years, they are much more well-qualified, and are usually able to get children engaged in their lessons better than parents. For instance, some parents nowadays still believe in route-learning, or learning everything by heart. Teachers nowadays, on the other hand, may incorporate vivid illustrations or stimulating games as part of their teaching process, which is undoubtedly more appealing and can attract ore students’ attention.
To conclude, my view is that students can only grasp knowledge the most effectively with a teacher, for the reasons stated above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...als to guide their offsprings’ learning process. While this may be true to a certain ex...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21885521886 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92948255898 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599326599327 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4008239571 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.166666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383250442873 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133277689583 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828728728347 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217882838388 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642365494794 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.