The state is the best institute in terms of administration. In contemporary times, due to the several shortcomings of neighboring countries, there are possibilities for developing illegal activities. Therefore, the idea of one government or universal authority has developed. In society, a certain segment of people support the idea but from my perspective though it has some benefits but can not outweigh the disadvantages. In the following paragraphs, it will be discussed.
To begin with positive aspects, firstly, if there is one government then the barrier among the countries will remove, therefore in terms of business for importing and exporting no tax will be included. As a result, the price of daily necessaries will be decreased. Secondly, the environmental issues can be easily solved rather than the national governments. For example, due to the growing economic competition sometimes the local government ignores the issues such as greenhouse gas emissions. If there is one authority then there will be no tendency of chasing, as a consequence, these problems can be resolved.
On the other hand, one governing body can not fulfill the demand in every corner of the world. Moreover, the local state makes laws, rules, and regulations by considering several aspects like religion, geographic situation, and enforce to people rightly which is not possible for the universal government. Sometimes it can create rebellion and even international issues. For example, China regulates Hong Kong and in 2020, they try to enforce a law on Hong Kong people then a chaotic situation was generated. Furthermore, corruption will increase, therefore it will be difficult for them to manage all of these issues. In addition, cultural identity will be diminished if there is a universal governing body and the world will be homogenized, especially if they started to speak a single language.
In conclusion, to sum up all the points above, it is clear that, one authority has many benefits but it can not cross the area of limitation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Content | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-09 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | Read full essay | |
| 2021-10-09 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | Read full essay | |
| 2021-10-09 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | Read full essay |
- Some people think young people should be free to choose their job while others believe that they should be realistic and think about their future Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or at countryside To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table below shows the expenses per week of a retired single person and a couple in Australia for their comfortable lifestyle Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28615384615 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1244998653 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.769197123 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.058823529 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3529411765 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141764371176 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476103723611 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575382807358 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831690477833 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307150950607 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.