Some people argue job satisfaction is more important than job security. Others believe a permanent job is more important. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The debate over the importance of job satisfaction and job security has become a predominant issue in society for years. While others stress the vitality of job satisfaction in preference to job security, I would argue that both these two factors are equally indispensable in light of the following interpretations.
On the one hand, it is plausible that job satisfaction could bring about benefits to both enterprises and employees. First and foremost, what workers can take advantage of job satisfaction is to help them steer clear of non-stop job hobbing. This is because once employees completely fancy their jobs, then it is unlikely for them to hand in a resignation form to pursue another work, which might bring both white and blue-collar workers with a stable income. Additionally, job satisfaction deems to benefit from job satisfaction. To be more specific, workers’ conscientiousness stemming from having a thirst for devotion to their jobs might enhance work efficiency, which, in turn, might accelerate revenue for the company.
On the other hand, the lower unemployment rate and credibility are what workers could gain from job security. To begin with, job security tends to attribute to the fall in the number of unemployed workers. Take Vietnam as a prime example, the fact that fresh graduates from military and police academies will be ensured their career prospects has contributed to the decrease in the unemployment rate. In tandem with this, gaining credibility from a line manager is also another advantage that job security could bring about. In practice, job commitment is likely to aid workers to gain credibility from their higher positions, which provides employees with a precious opportunity of getting promoted.
In conclusion, it is mighty that the argument on whether workers should highlight the essentiality on job security or job satisfaction could continue in the years to come. Although some contend that the former factor is less imperative than the later one, it is my firm conviction that no determinant surpasses its importance over the other one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ous opportunity of getting promoted. In conclusion, it is mighty that the argum...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, while, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29341317365 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04057210157 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565868263473 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5126066649 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.285714286 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341218910451 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134971894368 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829400171856 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230117327083 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867073158829 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.