Some people argue that job satisfaction is more important than job security, while others believe that they cannot always expect job satisfaction, and a permanent job is more important. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There are some people who assert that having jobs that can make them feel happy is more crucial than the ones that can ensure for them a stability in monthly income, whilst there are still some other persons opting for long commitment jobs that can provide for them stable income. In this essay, I am going to discuss two sides of the argument and give the reasons why I am prone to the idea that having a satisfied job is better.
Everyone has their own reasons, and those persons believing that fulfilled jobs can be prioritized in their job lists can also have their own reasonable explanations. First of all, happy is obviously one of the best source of energy that can help people work perfectly, effectively, constantly in many hours without being sense of boring, and simultaneously reduce stress and tired from works. If this source of energy is exhausted, people may find it difficult to continuously keep interest on work or just simply concentrate and keep it on the right track. Another delightful reason that it might stem from doing passionate job is that when people love their work and have lot of pleasant experience about it, they are likely to be encouraged and desirable to pursue their impulses in order to become more excellent and being promoted on the higher position in their job. Therefore, it is unnecessary to solely focus on security job because everyone can be their strong point in particular fields and they can do whatever they want as long as they have a special love for it and develop themselves.
On the opposite side, some people may emphasize on the importance of having a long commitment job, because it could help them to ensure the stable monthly income without worrying about being unemployed. Beside those employees can receive benefit packages and welfare through their owners such as health insurance or retirement saving plan. It is apparent that our ancestors were used to work a lot for the government where they can have sense of security, even nowadays, more and more young are seeking long-term jobs because the unemployment rate are highly increasing and the job market are more competitive than before. In addition, the living expenses are also rising so that people are prone to be more careful in choosing for themselves jobs that can provide to them with a permanent source of income.
All in all, these two side of argument are shown clearly their strong points, though both of these may have their minus points which is not mentioned above. However , I firmly incline to assert that having passionate job is still my best choice because only through that I can find myself more creativity, innovated, diligent at work and become the best version of myself in the future.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ts which is not mentioned above. However , I firmly incline to assert that having ...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... best version of myself in the future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, in addition, in particular, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 58.0 24.0651302605 241% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 468.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85042735043 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49556596435 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50641025641 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 722.7 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.5317886772 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.615384615 106.682146367 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 20.7667163134 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276015424733 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105234042222 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657862147695 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179402663398 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552664063607 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ts which is not mentioned above. However , I firmly incline to assert that having ...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... best version of myself in the future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, in addition, in particular, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 58.0 24.0651302605 241% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 468.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85042735043 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49556596435 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50641025641 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 722.7 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.5317886772 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.615384615 106.682146367 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 20.7667163134 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276015424733 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105234042222 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657862147695 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179402663398 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552664063607 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.