Some people argue that teaching children of different abilities together benefits all of them. Others believe that intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about the teaching methodology. However, whether several schools offer separated scheme for elite students. Personally, I think this practice generally has more benefits on several different levels.
One reason for this is that it allow teacher to employ different pedagogic strategies suited to particular groups of pupils. For instance, intelligent students who are more likely to have a quicker mind and stronger thirst for knowledge, tutors can include something more difficult or complex in their syllabus, catering for the special needs. As the result, practical experiences an extremely smooth in teaching and learning progress. Therefore, the separated teaching scheme is generally good.
On the other hand, teaching all students together in class can add motivation to learn each other. For example, intelligent students who usually have a good academic knowledge, however, other students are master at phycical and social skills. Studying together is a good enviroment in interaction.
Overall, I think it is not bad to separate students and nurture them individually. The authorities should take into consideration their pupils’ owner preference as to being in or out of one particular group so that the benefits of this system can be maximized.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...practice generally has more benefits on several different levels. One reason for this is that it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 426, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to progress'
Suggestion: to progress
...tremely smooth in teaching and learning progress. Therefore, the separated teaching sch...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 200.0 315.596192385 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96396693639 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7257791974 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161674099672 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595126722325 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315692573165 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965057011936 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179195544432 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.