Some people believe that the activities of large multinational corporations mostly benefits the economies of developing countries. Other people take the opposite view and feel that these large multinationals are general harmful.
Discuss both of views and give your opinion.
Recently, Global corporation is the hot trend among companies from four parts of the world. It is argued that the actions of huge global companies bring advantages to nations with developing economies, while others consider that these corporations have negative effects. In my opinion, although there are still some drawbacks, I believe that large multinationals can contribute mostly to the growth of countries.
The lack of money and workforce are main problems which local businesses face to when large multinational corporations are settled. As can be known that global companies spend a huge amount of budget on advertisement campaigns. It means that the more their images appear on TV or social media, the more customers know about them and purchase their goods. Therefore, the national companies meet a lot of difficulties to widen their branches. Moreover, there is not enough employees to work in local businesses, which can threaten the economic development in their own countries. This is because, unlike global corporations, nationals cannot offer higher salary as well as better welfare to attract applicants.
Despite the aforementioned problems, I would contend that huge global companies are, in fact, mostly benefit the economies of developing nations. One key advantage is that the internal investment can help create job opportunities for local people. This can lead an increase wage, which is only one indicator of economic growth. The other good point is that global companies give staffs chances to learn and develop. As can be known that each nation has specific culture and developing plans. Therefore, when joining to work for multinationals, they can learn valuable lessons from each other to improve their weaknesses and contribute to the growth of their own countries.
In conclusion, although the shortage of budget and workforce can threaten to the economies of development, I strongly believe that large multinationals corporations have positive effects on countries' growth because of more job opportunities and chances to learn and improve.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-23 | Ngọc Lam | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-18 | Linhthuy0104 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-18 | Linhthuy0104 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-18 | Linhthuy0104 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-18 | Linhthuy0104 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that the activities of large multinational corporations mostly benefits the economies of developing countries Other people take the opposite view and feel that these large multinationals are general harmful Discuss both of views and gi 73
- Some people believe that the activities of large multinational corporations mostly benefits the economies of developing countries Other people take the opposite view and feel that these large multinationals are general harmful Discuss both of views and gi 73
- Some people believe that it is better to live and work in vertical cities Others however think that horizontal cities are better for living and working Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that the activities of large multinational corporations mostly benefits the economies of developing countries Other people take the opposite view and feel that these large multinationals are general harmful Discuss both of views and gi 73
- Some people believe that it is better to live and work in vertical cities Others however think that horizontal cities are better for living and working Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...multinational corporations are settled. As can be known that global companies spen...
^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...s corporations have positive effects on countries growth because of more job opportunitie...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45341614907 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99215181656 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555900621118 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3607574395 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151468230913 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510028196025 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607572336052 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113310607608 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526197181702 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.