Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choice on everyday matters (such as food, cloths and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decision about matters that affect them.
Giving children the freedom to decide on everyday matters is debatable. According to some people, allowing freedom of choice to children will make them selfish in the future while others think this practice is essential to develop confidence and creativity. In my view, by letting children to choose whatever they want will make them self-contained in the future.
On one side, imposing restriction on children on certain things would hinder their confidence, they would think that they are not capable enough to make decision. On top of that, children find it harder to be creative with low confidence level. Research shows that, singers and actors enjoyed high level of freedom at their early age. If children do not get enough freedom, they might become less creative than who were given freedom to take their decision.
On the other hand, total freedom with no restriction would divert children in a wrong direction. This will give wrong message to the children that, everything is achievable hence they can do whatever they like. This hampers the behavior of children and they would become self oriented in their adulthood. For instance, one of my cousin has developed bad manner as he only thinks of himself. Therefore, parents should take in charge of everyday decision of their child.
In conclusion, people are becoming selfish day by day and by allowing children to take all decision on their own would only make the situation worse. Although, either opinion carries certain logic but taking decision for children would only give positive outcome.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-05-09 | cocococo123 | 67 | view |
2019-05-09 | cocococo123 | 61 | view |
2019-05-09 | cocococo123 | 61 | view |
2019-02-11 | Lien Tran | 73 | view |
2019-01-15 | gunner | 73 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 56
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?What other measures do you think might be effective? 73
- With all the problems in the world today, spending money on space exploration is a complete waste. The money could be better spent on other causes. 67
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast train between cities. others believe the money should be spend on improving existing public transport. 61
- Some people say that excessive noise should be a criminal offence. While other say that they should be free to make noise without limitation. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14509803922 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51158025375 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572549019608 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7751305668 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7142857143 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223928857962 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804421757914 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510288354122 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142454807004 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257721627824 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.