It is highly debatable issue that whether the authorities should invest on constructing new public buildings rather than the restoration of old ones. I disagree with this notion. However, in my opinion, old buildings tell us about our existence and without a historical buildings a country look like a bird without wings.
There are multifarious benefits of renovating old buildings. To begin with, old buildings depict our history and culture of an ancient time. So, the preservation and restoration of these buildings is more important because it is very difficult to find the same artistic and architectures work nowadays. For instance, the Jalian wala bagh in Amritsar shows the people who lost their lives, this revives patriotism in the youth. Another is the Taj Mahal in india, a monument of love serves as an example of unconditional love.
Moreover, historical buildings should be preserved for the future generation. The way of restoration would be fruitful to aware them about our cultural role. Furthermore, old buildings are not only beneficial at local level but also attract the foreign individuals. Mostly tourists are take keen interest in the historical places. If the tourists are visited in a particular nation than it became more useful for the economy growth.
On the other hand, some proponents think that taxed money should be used by government on the construction of new buildings like museums and libraries instead of preserving old historic sites. They argue that the more investment is required for the old buildings to make it more attractive.
To sum up, historical buildings should be preserved by government by investing more on it instead of cosidering new buildings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'building'?
Suggestion: building
... our existence and without a historical buildings a country look like a bird without wing...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25547445255 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94434857916 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602189781022 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8455551437 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185798096495 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561436686905 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515090412764 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109712999292 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445905883075 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.