Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
With the proliferation of contemporary lifestyles comes a wide range of socio-economic dilemmas. Indeed, the question of whether the government should increase expenditure on the transit system, or on high-speed rail remains a source of controversy. Although building streets is beneficial to some extents, I would argue that funding on train and subways lines offers more advantages.
On the one hand, it is undeniable the important role of the transportation system in the modern society, nowadays. There are several reasons why there would be essential to construct and widen more roads system. Firstly, expanding streets plays a crucial role to the urbanization which could develop the transportation infrastructure to the fringe. As a result for this is that the population density of the cities could be distributed more properly and releasing the burden of the traffic. Secondly, developing more expressways offers more convenient options for the people if they want to travel around the city . This is because these vehicle owners can circulate easily during the rush hour; therefore, the traffic congestion could be alleviated.
On the other hand, I believe that in spite of numerous benefits of the extensive highways, it is more beneficial to boost expenditure on mass transportation results in more favorable outcomes. One particularly good illustration for this is the reducing personal vehicles and congestion issues. With regard to the former, public transportation system has a capacity to travel more quickly with a large number of passengers and the private transportation could be reduced respectively. Another advantage of increasing disbursement on transit network in which there could be convenient maneuver due to a plenty of spaces among traffic equipment, therefore, this help drivers to avoid the traffic jams and make them safer than on their departures.
In conclusion, while some individuals say that the government should expand more highways to mitigate the gridlock for the cities, it seems to me that spending aggregate expenditure on train and subway lines is much more reasonable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lifestyles'' or 'lifestyle's'?
Suggestion: lifestyles'; lifestyle's
... With the proliferation of contemporary lifestyles comes a wide range of socio-economic di...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...nge of socio-economic dilemmas. Indeed, the question of whether the government should increase expendit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... subways lines offers more advantages. On the one hand, it is undeniable the im...
^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...e essential to construct and widen more roads system. Firstly, expanding streets play...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e if they want to travel around the city . This is because these vehicle owners ca...
^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... a capacity to travel more quickly with a large number of passengers and the private transportati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e them safer than on their departures. In conclusion, while some individuals sa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result, in spite of, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49541284404 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14918659177 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574923547401 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.540799166 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.357142857 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196265865067 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061071807386 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050876708823 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123840139705 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302351862768 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.