Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Opinion are divided on whether government should increase investment in building more and wider roads to decrease traffic congestion or whether they should put more emphasis on constructing rail transport and underground trains. While I understand why some people support the former view, I am still in favour of the latter.
I understand why some people believe that the increase in number and width of the roads can have positive impacts on traffic gridlock. From their point of view, it is obvious that building more roads means vehicles will distribute reasonably rather than cram on one street only. To put it in a simpler way, the more roads are constructed, the fewer vehicles are on the each street. Besides, wider roads will also help lessen the dense of traffic in comparison with small roads. In particular, wide roads allow multiple people to commune to work more easily instead of jamming on small streets at a time. The result of this is the considerable improvement in traffic jam.
Nevertheless, I still side with those who believe that trains and subways lines should be invested more by the government. Travelling by these means of transportation leads to the decrease in private vehicles use since trains can carry a large number of people at a time. As a result, traffic congestion can be no longer a popular concern. In addition, we can guarantee the number of roads that is sufficient for the continuous increase in vehicles in the years to come. Therefore, making improvement on public transportation such as subway lines and trains can be a solution in the long run.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging why people think it is necessary to emphasize on building more and wider roads, I hold the believe that traffic congestion can be improved better by constructing more rail transport.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...d more by the government. Travelling by these means of transportation leads to the decrease...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ate vehicles use since trains can carry a large number of people at a time. As a result, traffic ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n building more and wider roads, I hold the believe that traffic congestion can be improved...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...ilding more and wider roads, I hold the believe that traffic congestion can be improved...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0298013245 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83250421501 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513245033113 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8712150193 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301373761509 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101123572645 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578900558844 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196687651533 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402798476169 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.