The charts below show the reasons why undergraduates and postgraduates choose to
go to Parker university.
The pie charts beneath provide the factors that affect both undergraduates and postgraduates to study in Park University.
It can be seen that both groups shared a similar pattern in which reputation of university and cost were the major reasons.
With regard to undergraduates, the reputation of the university had most impact on their choices, which attracted 34% of students. There was a percentage of 24% students deciding to enroll on Park University due to its cost. The students who studied at Park University because of personal recommendation accounted for 18% of total students. Other factors such as available of accommodation, location and other evenly distributed, from 7% to 8%.
42% of postgraduates chose Park University for its reputation, which was 10% more than those studied because of the cost. Personal recommendation of postgraduates had a low proportion which was 3 times less than that of undergraduates. The percentages of other reasons in terms of preferences to choose the university were inconsiderable as well, at around 6% and 8% each.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tgraduates to study in Park University. It can be seen that both groups shared a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, well, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30588235294 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38561990562 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 12.4255809413 43.030603864 29% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.222222222 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160263563521 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663348563596 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478426193705 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100350137763 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497719203142 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.