Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study in universities. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In this day and age, it can be noticed that full course tuition in various universities in some nations has risen significantly leading to many students can not afford to pay these fees. There are several perspectives that the authorities should purchase these for undergraduates. To a certain extent, I agree that the government's subsidization for the tuition fees paid could mitigate the student’s financial pressure. However, I think this strategy could make a huge loss in university income.
On the one hand, the opinion about subsidizing tuition fees to students is attractive for several reasons. Initially, contributing money to undergraduate could reduce the student's financial stress. It is true that some students have achievement on national or international achievements and then qualified for one prestigious university in their nation. However, this school has an exorbitant tuition fee. Thus, if students do not pay for the full course on time, they will miss the opportunity to study in that school, Therefore, with government subsidization for education purposes or a scholarship for high achievement in national or international competitions, undergraduates may feel more comfortable not being paid a high full course fee and they can concentrate on their studies and relevant activities in universities. For instance, in 2019, the Government of Vietnam awarded a 20-million Viet Nam Dong scholarship to five students who successfully achieved a gold medal in Mathematics and Physics Olympics Competitions, and this awarded prize was used for paying their tuition fees at the university where they studied. Furthermore, these scholarships could be a motivation for students to expand their knowledge, become more hard-working and gain an excellent grade point average in university.
On the other hand, I believe that purchasing the tuition fees completely for the students is not effective for some reasons. First, universities may lose their income from students’ tuition fees. These days almost all universities in the world are independent in financial aspects, and tuition fees are the main source of income. To illustrate, the Vietnam National Economics University gained over 10 billion Viet Nam Dong from tuition fees. In the event that the government imposes subsidization for undergraduates only for academic purposes with a fixed cost, schools may lose their money to pay for various sectors such as services, infrastructure maintenance, and salaries for teachers and staff. Hence, they may not have enough budget to remain in operation. Additionally, suppose that there are a lot of students who claimed scholarships from the government, the authorities may have to reduce their allocates for other branches like health, and national defense even increases individual income taxes to add to the scholarship fund. As a result, the disapproval of subsidizing full-course fees may be rising in the community.
In summary, university education shall not completely free, however, the fees shall not be too burdensome for the students. From my perspective, universities may be awarded a scholarship to students who have struggled with situations or gained some accomplishments in academics and training.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
.... To a certain extent, I agree that the governments subsidization for the tuition fees paid...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, i think, in summary, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2750.0 1615.20841683 170% => OK
No of words: 495.0 315.596192385 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55555555556 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24531731595 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482828282828 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 853.2 506.74238477 168% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.8926797773 49.4020404114 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.952380952 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7619047619 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346074544914 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106671385924 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629055099651 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230897947465 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495009134946 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.