Nowadays young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities. Why does this happen? Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In today's world, it can be seen that the younger generation tends to choose the big cities to settle in instead of living in their houses in remote areas. There are a variety of reasons to explain this phenomenon. From my point of view, there are certain benefits to this trend, but its drawbacks are far weightier.
On the one hand, there are two prime causes that lead to the urban migration of young adults. First and foremost, resulting from imbalanced social development in multiple aspects, geographical differences in life quality are a major trigger. Less likely to be a regional economic or political center to attract large corporations' investments, most rural or remote areas may not be able to show their advantages in the provision of sufficient job opportunities, let alone rewarding positions with competitive compensation and benefits packages. As a result, despite the forced competition in the local labor market, many metropolises, thanks to their prosperity, are attractive to fresh graduates in terms of high incomes and more promising career paths with substantially working experience accumulated from famous conglomerates. Thus, the employees could reach a high standard of living to fulfill their family needs. Additionally, benefiting from the stronger economy, urban local infrastructure, including educational systems, tends to be developed, with more funding for teaching facilities and competitive incentives for experienced faculties.
On the other hand, I consider that few disadvantages have arisen from working or studying in several urban territories. To begin with, developed metropolises would deal with harmful issues like traffic jams, population explosions, and pressure on infrastructure and services. For instance, in Hanoi, which is the capital and also a densely populated city in Vietnam, when citizens hang out at rush hours, it might seem to be that pollution and traffic congestion are caused by overusing private vehicles like cars or motorbikes. Besides, the uneven population distribution may cause soaring property prices, originating from the effect between limited urban space and higher demand for accommodation. Furthermore, young people are likely to encounter a series of life pressures from either work or study due to the force of competition in urban areas. Additionally, a widening gap between urban and rural areas means that local economic progress may be decreased significantly. This might be explained by the fact that the entire human resources of the countryside might be utilized. However, the beneficiaries are expected to be large cities only. Losing a young and competent labor force is the most frequently criticized immediate loss to the farming industry.
In summary, it is no doubt that living in a metropolis is a good opportunity for young people, as well as the possibly improved living standard accordingly. Nevertheless, I would argue that the adverse impacts of the disequilibrium in the population distribution between rural and urban areas on society as a whole might be significant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd, but its drawbacks are far weightier. On the one hand, there are two prime cau...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... immediate loss to the farming industry. In summary, it is no doubt that living i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for instance, in summary, no doubt, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2607.0 1615.20841683 161% => OK
No of words: 475.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48842105263 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15231085268 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 176.041082164 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581052631579 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 833.4 506.74238477 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.1009237796 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.833333333 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3888888889 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7777777778 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194053164494 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597886730695 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355646406489 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1126944176 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368839289895 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 78.4519038076 204% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.