Social people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Economic development has been a major priority in many parts of the world, being an effective means of addressing starvation and poverty. While it is mentioned by some that economic growth proves to be the only solution, others argue that this would have detrimental effects on the environment and should not be continued. This essay will discuss both aspects of this arguement and outline my opinion on the same.
On the one hand, solid economic progress is indispensable to tackling hunger and poverty. To begin with, economic growth shows a current country's wealth. In other words, the proliferation of economic success will mitigate the unemployment rate, thus boosting people's standards of living and also creating more employment opportunities. For instance, most developing countries, such as Vietnam and India, are suffering from hunger and poverty, and the only way to diminish this problem is that the authorities should take necessary action to promote commercial growth. Furthermore, a highly developed economy means sustained investment in the agricultural sector. Thriving conglomerates would join hands with the government to support the modernization and innovation of farming methods and techniques. This would result in enhanced productivity in farming practices, and food security would be assured. Consequently, the total national output will increase significantly.
On the other hand, the rapid development of economic progress in each nation could have detrimental impacts on the environment. First and foremost, industrialization, coupled with economic growth, has resulted in ever-increasing environmental pollution. To illustrate, according to Nature, which is one of the most famous magazines in the world, contaminated air coming from industrial zones increases greenhouse gas emissions. As a result, this leads to global warming and causes many tragedies, such as climate change, hurricanes, or respiratory diseases. Additionally, several actions, like deforestation to cultivate crops, will destroy natural habitats and the natural imbalance of the planet.
In summary, the tremendous commercial improvement can be a measure to end the hunger and poverty of every country. Although the expansion could cause side effects like pollution and global warming, I think that if businesses and the authorities show concern about environmental consequences, they would be willing to invest in environmentally friendly technology and make optimal use of resources in order to minimize these effects. I also predict that environmental-related drawbacks can possibly be overcome in the near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment and outline my opinion on the same. On the one hand, solid economic progress...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 486, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...ct that environmental-related drawbacks can possibly be overcome in the near future.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, thus, while, for instance, i think, in summary, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2246.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83376623377 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47645042237 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620779220779 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6154342432 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.777777778 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204662112657 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058805647085 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614534269411 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1196004076 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627195872756 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.