Social people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Economic development has been a major priority in many parts of the world, being an effective means of addressing starvation and poverty. While it is mentioned by some that economic growth proves to be the only solution, others argue that this would have detrimental effects on the environment and should not be continued. This essay will discuss both aspects of this argument and outline my opinion on the same.
On the one hand, solid economic progress is indispensable to tackling hunger and poverty. To begin with, economic growth shows a current country's wealth. In other words, the proliferation of economic success will mitigate the unemployment rate, thus boosting people's standards of living and also creating more employment opportunities. For instance, most developing countries, such as Vietnam and India, are suffering from hunger and poverty, and the only way to diminish this problem is that the authorities should take necessary action to promote commercial growth. Furthermore, a highly developed economy means sustained investment in the agricultural sector. This might be explained by the fact that thriving conglomerates would join hands with the government to support the modernization and innovation of farming methods and techniques. This would result in enhanced productivity in farming practices, and food security would be assured. Hence, the total national output will increase significantly.
On the other hand, the rapid development of economic progress in each nation could have detrimental impacts on the environment. First and foremost, industrialization, coupled with economic growth, has resulted in ever-increasing environmental pollution. To illustrate, according to Nature, which is one of the most famous magazines in the world, contaminated air coming from industrial zones increases greenhouse gas emissions. As a result, this leads to global warming and causes many tragedies, such as climate change, hurricanes, or respiratory diseases. Additionally, several actions, like deforestation to cultivate crops, will destroy natural habitats and the ecological imbalance of the planet.
In summary, the tremendous commercial improvement can be a measure to end the hunger and poverty of every country. Although the expansion could cause side effects like pollution and global warming, I think that if businesses and the authorities show concern about environmental consequences, they would be willing to invest in environmentally friendly technology and make optimal use of resources in order to minimize these effects. I also predict that environmental-related drawbacks can possibly be overcome in the near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 486, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...ct that environmental-related drawbacks can possibly be overcome in the near future.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, while, for instance, i think, in summary, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2268.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7417721519 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2713171327 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617721518987 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7101555894 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.368421053 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7894736842 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36842105263 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199214928402 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583717308775 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585814696341 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118196988641 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615755276512 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 78.4519038076 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.