Some people believe that individuals cannot improve the environment, but only governments and big companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, environmental issues have become a major topic of discussion among people and governments. Many individuals/people argue that environmental protection can be achieved only by governments or large business conglomerates. I strongly disagree with this opinion, as small movements can have a significant impact. Also, any individual effort for the protection of the environment will be highly appreciated and supported by the public, and this will increase the momentum.
Even though the majority of individuals think individual efforts are useless; they have a significant impact on a bigger picture. For example, in the waste management process segregating the household garbage items will take only a few minutes for the person who is sending the waste materials to the government agencies, but it provides a more significant advantage for the government bodies since it is easier for them to process the properly separated waste materials. If everyone thinks that they cannot make any difference, there will not be any positive move. Therefore, it is crucial for everyone to do whatever they can to protect the environment.
Also, if individual efforts to protect the environment are highlighted through the proper channel, they will inspire many more people to follow the same path. For example, in 2017, Mr Prashant, the then district collector of Kozhikode, took the personal initiative to clean a public lake in the district and he publicised/promoted the campaign on his Facebook page. After hearing about this, hundreds of local community persons joined the movement and made it a success. If that person were waiting for the government to take action, this would not happen. This clearly shows that any minor initiatives, especially for the betterment of the environment, will receive massive support from the public if we publicise it properly.
To conclude, small efforts made by the individuals for the protection of the environment certainly make a difference and encourage others also to contribute. In light of this, we can firmly oppose the given argument which underestimates individual efforts, and clearly state that individual contribution is as much significant as the support provided by government bodies and multinational companies.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48857142857 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19691305187 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554285714286 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9400389232 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.066666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13333333333 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173576233002 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668599452027 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533140418921 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116769881342 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461516318082 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.