Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People in the general public have different views about how to do when they encounter a hardship in life. Whereas some people advocate that the best way is to accept such a situation, I believe that it is much better to try to overcome difficulties in life.
Some may argue that embracing an undesirable situation is best because it is favorable for the mental health. If people try to resist the hardship, it will impose significant psychological stress on themselves. This can break their heart and cause some mental problems, such as depression. However, if they accept the difficulty as it is, they will be free of stress because it is unnecessary to spend a great amount of energy on solving the problems.
Nevertheless, I believe that attempting to improve such situations is better than accepting them. This is because this experience enables individuals to achieve a happier life in the future. In the process of tackling the stressful situations, people learn a lot about how to deal with problems in their lives. The ideas that they obtained in the process can be adapted to other similar situations that can happen in future. This allows them to solve various problems in life much more easily, which makes their life more comfortable and happier. Soichiro Honda, who is a founder of Japanese automobile company, struggled to create a high quality car despite the shortage of the budget when he launched his business. He attributed the great success both in his company and his life to the toil in his youth.
To sum up, although some may maintain accepting an unfavorable situation is the best, I insist that trying to improve such situations is better because it will lead to much happier life in future.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
People in the general public have different views about how to do wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ercome difficulties in life. Some may argue that embracing an undesirable situation...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ther similar situations that can happen in future. This allows them to solve various prob...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 809, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and his life to the toil in his youth. To sum up, although some may maintain ac...
^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...cause it will lead to much happier life in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, whereas, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88054607509 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7168350261 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525597269625 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3397017726 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.142857143 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277957510346 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991005684308 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105956509236 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195561957184 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652303708447 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
People in the general public have different views about how to do wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ercome difficulties in life. Some may argue that embracing an undesirable situation...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ther similar situations that can happen in future. This allows them to solve various prob...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 809, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and his life to the toil in his youth. To sum up, although some may maintain ac...
^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...cause it will lead to much happier life in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, whereas, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88054607509 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7168350261 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525597269625 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3397017726 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.142857143 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277957510346 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991005684308 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105956509236 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195561957184 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652303708447 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.