In life, a lot of situations may happen to people, including the bad situations. Some people think that the best way to deal with them is by accepting it, while others believe that striving and improving the situation is better. I completely agree with the latter statement, that it is preferable to struggle and improve the current bad situation.
On the one hand, when facing unwanted circumstances, some people choose to accept them. This is because they think that some bad situations can't be changed, even though they have worked hard. And because the situation can't be changed, the only thing that can be changed is their attitude. Thus, rather than complaining and being ungrateful, they choose to accept those conditions. For instance, an employee named John, experiences bad situation where he is only paid with low wage, even though he has worked hard. Because he has given his best try and his condition still does not change, John then decides to just accept it. While this point of view is correct, I think there is a better way to deal with unwanted conditions.
Some other people choose to improve unwanted conditions which happen to them. This is because they believe that if they keep struggling and striving, those bad situations will change into better situations. Even though at first it seems that those unwanted circumstances will change, but there will be a way to finally change the situations. For example, a basketball legend, Michael Jordan, was not a great basketball player in his teenage life in 1982. But he never gave up and worked really hard to improve his performance. Although at first Jordan experienced a lot of obstacles and his situation remained the same, but finally today we all know Michael Jordan as one of the greatest NBA players of all time.
In conclusion, accepting bad situations is a good way to deal with unwanted circumstances, but I personally believe that striving and improving the bad conditions is better, because it can turn the bad situations into a better situation.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatifactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...use they think that some bad situations cant be changed, even though they have worke...
^^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... worked hard. And because the situation cant be changed, the only thing that can be ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...ked hard. Because he has given his best try and his condition still does not change, Jo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, really, so, still, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95906432749 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70262131353 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482456140351 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7174414054 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7647058824 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239597501044 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847814616635 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724480514012 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184106894564 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598838829123 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.