Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People’s Satisfaction has been regarded as almost the most significant factor of owning a great lifespan by them. A group of individuals claim that adopting to even horrible conditions is the best way to live. While, others argue that boosting those situations has been necessary to get out of their adverse effects. I myself concur with the second opinion which believes under those circumstances, one of the valuable measure is that to alter them.
To commence with, accepting current situation has led people to consider several aspects of their life. According to some researches, many people have not been fond of changing their conditions and also not welcome new ones. That could be result in one of the human’s characteristics which they have a keen interest in simple and predictable changes. As a result, they may find their new career difficult even though it is not that hard. Moreover, thought of developing them may end up to even worse conditions. As people have not been completely aware of all the aspects, they may make mistakes when it comes to alter them. Take, one graduate, for an example, who may have lots of difficulties for his or her first job, which may alter, if they bear them particularly at the beginning.
On the other hand, others who have argued that the only worthy way in worse conditions has been to improve them. In their opinion, humans just live once, so it has not been unjustified to stand some horrible situations. Since they may end up suffering from several diseases because of the difficulties to bear the anxiety. Furthermore, by enhancing their situation not only their content will be increased, but also may cause to make more profit. For instance, improving a method in unfavorable workplace such as helping from technology to produce information may have benefits for unsatisfied employees.
In conclusion, regarding to both views, I myself want to still claim that benefits of changing condition to be better have weigh the drawbacks. By altering horrible condition, there have been more possibilities to encounter with better opportunities as well as increasing content.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ble conditions is the best way to live. While, others argue that boosting those situa...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'making'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: making
...t will be increased, but also may cause to make more profit. For instance, improving a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'weighed'.
Suggestion: weighed
...of changing condition to be better have weigh the drawbacks. By altering horrible con...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08262108262 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84837314978 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566951566952 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.410934831 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.1111111111 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61111111111 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144355729904 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451696884282 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359007912063 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893929795656 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318910155816 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.