Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give yo

Essay topics:

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

People are having break through in science, business world and academics by acquiring more information. While Certain individuals argued that this Knowledge should be made known to people, other proponents are of the view it is of precious value and therefore, a price should be paid before such idea could be shared. This essay will discuss both viewpoint and my opinion will be given.

It is often thought by many people that the road to acquiring knowledge is stiff, and requires determination. These people believe that when the information is acquired, it should not be given out without restriction. People are to pay a price to get this idea. This would make the information valuable to such individuals. For instance, individuals lay more emphasis and treasure knowledge the paid for more than the one gotten freely. Thus, divulging information willingly to humans will have no value because they only appreciate the importance of knowledge when they paid for it.

Nevertheless, opponents that support sharing of information easily about scientific findings, business and collegiate, believe it will be essential for the individuals and beneficial to the world as a whole. For example, Professor Nkadi Chukwuemaka, an Obstetrician, discovered that Foetus can be transfused in utero, in case of rhesus isoimmunization. He discussed this finding with other colleagues, and today, this single out is being carried out in different part of the world by different people, as a result, foetuses can survive prenatal anaemia. Professor Chukwuemeka, was then awarded a noble price for this great achievement.

In conclusion, although scientific, business and academic information are valuable and should be guided with jealousy, I am of the opinion, that knowledge should be shared without restraining, because its positive effects could be used worldwide for the benefit of mankind

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r more than the one gotten freely. Thus, divulging information willingly to human...
^^^
Line 5, column 597, Rule ID: PRICE_PRIZE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'Nobel Prize' (reward)?
Suggestion: Nobel Prize
...ofessor Chukwuemeka, was then awarded a noble price for this great achievement. In conc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oble price for this great achievement. In conclusion, although scientific, busi...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41355932203 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01689202003 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566101694915 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8269281414 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.071428571 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22875570508 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800228475598 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623752950973 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143869454654 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00717453121004 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.