Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
In many nations of the world, traffic congestion and environmental pollution, have been on the increase in recent times. Some people are suggesting that by inflating the cost of petroleum, these issues will be mitigated. I completely agree with this suggestion because through this way, there will be a reduction in the usage of fuel by vehicle and large factories.
One of the benefits of increasing the cost of premium motor spirit is that there will be a significant reduction in the number of vehicles plying the roads. In other words, car owners will be left with no other option than to utilize public transportation and even ultramodern trains which are mostly powered by solar energy. Consequently, there will be massive reduction in traffic jams on the major roads owing to the fact that private car owners will opt for another means of transportation. Lagos State, which is in the western part of Nigeria, is a good example. Since the recent increment in the price of fuel, many car owners have been forced to patronise public transport services. As a result of this, there has been free flow of movement on the motor ways without gridlocks. Thus, if the cost of patrol had not been increased, the citizens would have continued suffering from traffic.
Another positive impact of increasing pump price is that environmental pollution will be eliminated. This is majorly true because gas emission from large industries and exhaust fumes released from vehicles into the atmosphere contaminate the environment. Perhaps with the increase in the cost of patrol, some factories would be forced to use other energy sources and also, private derivers would sort for another means of transportation. For instance, in Ghana, a country in Africa, industries make use water source energy for powering the machines because of the high cost of petroleum.
In conclusion, undoubtedly city dwellers have been faced with the growing number of traffic and pollution from vehicles and big factories. Increasing the the cost of patrol will inevitably alleviate these challenges .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 826, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Thus, if the cost of patrol had not been increased, the citizens would have conti...
^^
Line 7, column 887, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...zens would have continued suffering from traffic. Another positive impact of...
^^
Line 15, column 151, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... vehicles and big factories. Increasing the the cost of patrol will inevitably alleviat...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 151, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... vehicles and big factories. Increasing the the cost of patrol will inevitably alleviat...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 216, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ll inevitably alleviate these challenges .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19287833828 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8097989989 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528189910979 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7294186284 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978771912486 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375375537319 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363263129546 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0732577116387 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241676107607 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.