Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
What other measures do you think might be effective ?
Traffic congestions and gas emission from means of transportation have been the international contemporary complication. Recently the phenomenon has aroused wide concern that petrol for instance as well as other relevant materials should be fined more as a deterrent for consumption. From my perspective, I partly acquiesce the notions as there are starkly controversal cons and I am going to illustrate the by following quotes.
Indisputably, enforcing more taxation of these types of fuel can obscure individuals' unstable finance. Apparently, the majority of consumers constitute large proportion of residents from unstable monetary status where remaining components, referring to prosperous ones, prefer to travel by economical factors such as air, canoes, .... With this form of interception, the crisis seems to practically neutralise due to the abandon of numbers for the unaffordable vehicles' operation cost including fuels. Furthermore, in return, public services and bikes will be in promotion to adapt the demanding for moving which are strikingly possible to enhance better - qualified transport system and environmental adjustment.
Nonetheless, travelling instruments absorbing petrol had contributed a great deal of convenience to advance the substantial growth in shortening the distances. In fact, high - standard transportation exerted an compulsive feature in accelerate any process. If applying the enforcement with overmeasure, inhabitants will protest to reclaim their labor privilege. A good case in the point is that telecommunication are required to overcharge a large scale of goods or farmers must deliver their agricultural products to market. Consequently, the prevented issue would advent intensive numbers of crises.
From the indications I have striken above, Increase in the price would not be potential to alleviate the conditions. one may attribute to the problem that I might suggest could be the relevant propaganda as well as expanding education to raise the awareness of people of approaching excessive waste.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...relevant materials should be fined more as a deterrent for consumption. From my pe...
^^
Line 1, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to illustrate the by following quotes. Indisputably, enforcing more taxation of...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...to prosperous ones, prefer to travel by economical factors such as air, canoes, .... With ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...abandon of numbers for the unaffordable vehicles operation cost including fuels. Further...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 715, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt system and environmental adjustment. Nonetheless, travelling instruments abso...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 209, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... high - standard transportation exerted an compulsive feature in accelerate any pr...
^^
Line 9, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld advent intensive numbers of crises. From the indications I have striken abov...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... potential to alleviate the conditions. one may attribute to the problem that I mig...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, nonetheless, so, well, for instance, in fact, in short, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89966555184 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36186004735 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.702341137124 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6454289633 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0631233074706 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0185390268023 0.084324248473 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026358119836 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0400557082895 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313755253817 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.49 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.