Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Currently, most people think in the present and do not consider in the future enough. Therefore, some people insist that to affect their daily lives, fuel prices ought to be raised. However, others insist that this may be worse since petrol is one of the diminishing resources on the earth. In my point of view, I do not consider it is appropriate to raise fuel prices.
It is theorized that increasing fuel price will significantly decrease fossil fuel usage, as economic impact will be forced onto current users. Raising the price will make people switch to public transport instead of driving on their own. Critics of this may occur, however, the advocates declare that this is the most efficient way to prevent great traffic and non-stop pollution issue.
Nevertheless, fuel prices are not only linked to transport, but also to food production, home heating and entertainment. A rise in prices would seriously affect the standard of living families with limited income and would mean poorer parts of society would become even poorer. Raising the price of petrol is not a proper way since the society may collapse due to the high price of living standard. Instead, the government should implement green laws to prevent excess fossil fuel usage, and search for alternative energy resources. In some countries, people are encouraged to take the electricity-driven bus to their work.
To sum up, raising the price of petrol may be an effective way to solve the issue, however, it is not the best way to do. Seeking for alternative energy resources and implement related laws are continuous ways to save our environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04444444444 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70867376778 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559259259259 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.5334108996 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.2857142857 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182692063038 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638962167683 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671319464691 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122411305279 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565828219273 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.