In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this case?
What can be done about this problem?
Since human civilization has developed, there is no doubt that agriculture plays a vital role. The knowledge of farming is the backbone of human nature, not only enables people to have sufficient food resource, but also boosts industrialization. However, though agriculture seems to become mature nowadays, there are still over ten thousand people starving every year. In this essay, I will discuss reasons which may cause to this, and then give some possible solutions.
The main reason that contributes to starvation is the imbalanced resource distribution and globalization. Most of the crops including coffee or tropical fruits are from Africa and Latin America. The farmers spent their most of time planting these harvests; however, they only got a little money at the end. The ingredients are sent to different places, and sell at over ten times higher prices than the farmers’ revenue. This has made a vicious cycle: the poor get poorer, and the rich get richer.
To be honest, it is inevitable to prevent people from purchasing these items. Instead, we can buy products that are supported by specific organizations. In the view of people suffering from famine, there are more and more fair-trade items come to existence. The aim of these items is to make sure the farmers will not be exploited, and be paid by fair prices. Though the changes may not appear soon, since there are more individuals concerning about this issue, those people who are starving can have a chance to live wealthier.
To sum up, the progress of globalization and international trade has accelerated the disparity between rich and poor. What individuals can do is turn to purchase fair-trade products to enable farmers to get what they should deserve.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, no doubt, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14385964912 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85904417237 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617543859649 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5484215379 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0625 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16399762886 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450849984115 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442586033226 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872510549936 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039776779035 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.