Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
These days, people have different views with regard to the question about sharing specialized knowledge relates to science, business, and education. Many opine that the more information is published, the better level of intellectuality people get. There is, however, a strong counter-argument that those data had better be kept confidential. From my perspective, I totally agree with the second outlook because of the dangers inherent in this information.
Initially, scientific accomplishments can be best acquired when there are no barriers. It is undeniable that the collaboration of experts and freely accessible information will generate a number of opportunities for people to obtain widespread knowledge. Owing to the involvement of interested parties, many significant ideas that are useful for the world’s upcoming development are now revealed. This leads to fruitful solutions to problems that the sole individual could not attain. Wikipedia, for instance, is a collection of data contributed by people’s knowledge and it irrefutably enables people to possess information on millions of diverse topics
Notwithstanding, the sharing of crucial data also is required to be scrutinized. Some particular types of information which are openly published may instigate a number of serious problems, especially, the devastating of society. The leaking of the data related to nuclear energy, poison is predicted to initiate the terrorist as the materials and chemical elements are revealed which facilitate the emergence of the policy chaos. Likewise, sharing information regarding business are able to cause plagiarized enterprises. It is pointed that the shared data could be abused by scammers with the intent to swindle consumers.
In conclusion, although the free permission of information-approached comprise many quoted benefits, some certain disadvantages are still worth minding, especially, the severe destruction of the entire civilization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 624, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s with the intent to swindle consumers. In conclusion, although the free permiss...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, look, may, regarding, second, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89122807018 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45553294155 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638596491228 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8984978745 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.928571429 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211379910201 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634899773307 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467259086458 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111436719757 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313005818009 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.