Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In this digital age, it is effortless for individuals to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and academic graphs. However, other people do not reckon that searching for these information freely is not ideal because these data are too valuable to access. From my perspective, I conceive that these views have both upsides and downsides.
On the one hand, there is no denying that people can take advantages of sharing information freely. The more information we extend, the more knowledge we get. To be more specific, human beings can be involved in many graphs of many fields if information is already published. For instance, most families usually read the news or watch TV in the morning as a ritual, which is useful for them to immerse themselves in totally orthodox information. Moreover, some individuals have to search for different fields of data to accomplish their tasks. University students are reachable to necessary knowledge for their academic scientific research. If more data is public, they will accomplish their academic studies faster.
On the other hand, some information is too valuable to access freely as it is. Admittedly, in most fields, scientists spend much effort applying themselves to research. It is attributed to that a lot of sources of materials are filed for the patent. The masses are obtainable to websites that contain so much available particular data, but they are just fundamental and common. Besides that, private data such as name, age, address, and the like, should be restricted. People sometimes get stuck in trouble because they share their private things or details in public. Criminals utilize them and do something unsafe and immoral.
To sum up, I can not deny sharing knowledge in different fields is beneficial, but personal information should be confidential for safety. People had better be aware of what kind of data they can publish and vice versa.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...people do not reckon that searching for these information freely is not ideal because these data ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f data they can publish and vice versa.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, kind of, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20317460317 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81192794636 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55873015873 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9613786486 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2631578947 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5789473684 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281779968763 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830373697706 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837358627008 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178572436963 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619751582574 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.