Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement?
It is often cited that in modern times, there is a vast number of options for members of society to choose from. Up to a point, I agree with this assessment.
On one hand, the plethora of choices is certainly accessible for citizens in developed parts of the world. The reason is that these areas are densely populated and this compels companies of all spheres of life, backed by the ever growing technologies in manufacturing goods serving different purposes, to come for their share of profits. A good example here is Paris, one of the world’s largest cosmopolitan centers that accommodate millions of city dwellers and several more of tourists. It is difficult to wander around Paris without catching sight of a variety of clothing stores, from fashionable boutiques to chain stores of major brands like Nike, Gucci or Prada or a diverse range of restaurants catering for all appetites.
On the other hand, I believe it is reasonable to say that the less populated , less wealthy remote locations are not granted this peculiar privilege of the civilized world. This could be explained by the fact such communities do not represent a promising market worth exploring to goods suppliers. There are ample justifications for my argument, including the mountainous towns in Vietnam. The low number of visitors and the geographical distances attenuate the enthusiasm among investors and as a result, the locals can only don one type of clothing throughout the year and restrict their menu to a few dishes using limited ingredients.
In conclusion, I am convinced that the diverse spectrum of choices can be enjoyed only by residents of developed areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...easonable to say that the less populated , less wealthy remote locations are not g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, well, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0989010989 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9159556179 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6336996337 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4791564672 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.545454545 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0559181159858 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0234090195105 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359755911992 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0329810707362 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271178945372 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.