In this contemporary era, conservation of the environment is a highly debatable issue as it has several positive aspects. Although, it is overlooked most of the time and one can not give their best to do it. If pondered, there are various root causes behind this occurrence and few precautionary steps to consider. Both the prospects are elaborated in the ensuing paragraphs.
Out of the all the posible reasons, some could be more responsible than other. The principle one is that, all citizens are not aware enogh to understand what the actual this issue and how it could found harmful if not any action taken. People have always a strong willingness to explore new scenic and green places, thus, they might save the nature either for entertainment purpose or for social status, but not to combat the burnning crisis of this modern world. For example, one recent survey carried out by The National Geography have concluded that only 12% plants and trees were survived after plantation in 2019. This is transparent illustration of no one have real time to protect our globe. Moreover tech-addicted generation believes that any problem can be solved by technology and money; thus, in a rush to earn more money and invenntion of new equipments they forgot our social and moral duty about conservation of nature.
However, variety of small efforts of all the individuals could attributed to address this phenomenon. Government should focus more on countryside rather than in urban areas, as most of the pure environment is left there and available population are illitrate and unaware about this issue at international level. Several stringent law and panelty would be imposed for law-breakers in citified region, because mejority of people are know about environment protection and then also not doing so. Apart form that, several campaign such as wildlife sencturies, eco-zone, national parks, dam constuction, tree plantation on vulnarable areas and awardes to the nature lovers could be work at a global leval.
To conclude, protection of god-gifted nature is a significant for us, nonetheless it is highly ignored. Although environment had affected due to unconciousness and unawareness, combinational effort of citizens and authority could deal with it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 700, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ne have real time to protect our globe. Moreover tech-addicted generation believes that ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'attribute'
Suggestion: attribute
...ll efforts of all the individuals could attributed to address this phenomenon. Government ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 493, Rule ID: APART_FORM[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'apart from'?
Suggestion: Apart from
... protection and then also not doing so. Apart form that, several campaign such as wildlife...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 510, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun campaign seems to be countable; consider using: 'several campaigns'.
Suggestion: several campaigns
...hen also not doing so. Apart form that, several campaign such as wildlife sencturies, eco-zone, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 701, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lovers could be work at a global leval. To conclude, protection of god-gifted na...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and authority could deal with it.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25619834711 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.946102934 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614325068871 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3990847736 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211320310736 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593233900082 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364474102509 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1160362021 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244396462354 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.