Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Views can vary on whether those professionally trained, such as doctors or engineers, need to work in the country of training as a requirement or they can freely choose to start their profession in another nation. Although the former viewpoint appears appealing to a certain extent, the latter opinion should be better advocated from my perspective.
Some are of the opinion that professionals, as required, had better work in the nation where they acquired their training. Among the supporting arguments, if they were trained in the homeland, their country may face a brain drain once many of them migrate to another country for work. In some Asian nations, this is true since many Asians favour working opportunities in Western countries over those in their nations. In addition, high-cost tertiary education may be subsidized by taxpayers in some countries. Consequently, having professionals work in their training nation can allow them to serve the local citizens and repay the society assisting them.
Nevertheless, others, including me, believe that professionals can freely work in another country as they wish. Cited to support this idea, as everyone can have the right to be fulfilled with their life, they should also have the right to choose their workplace after graduation, wherever they were professionally trained. Additionally, in the context of globalization, this can offer them opportunities to exchange expertise across international borders. Furthermore, requiring professionals to serve in the country where they obtained their training may result in their unwillingness during work. In other words, it can unwantedly lead to job dissatisfaction even if it is optimal enough to solve the issue of brain drain.
In conclusion, although professionals should work in the country where they received their training, I assume that they had better have the right to choose which nation to work in.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05078496274 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8214379999 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.615384615 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448545627421 0.244688304435 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16649594684 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108871002699 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302274354914 0.151304729494 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256661209572 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.