Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Recently, a lot of nations have witnessed a sharp rise in the number of tourists. Some people think that it is necessary to ban tourism in some areas to preserve territorial culture whereas others totally disagree with it. From my perspective, that change is unavoidable and restricting visitors will be detrimental to a nation and socitey.
First and foremost, critics of tourism insist that the tourists ought to be prohibited since they are likely to destroy the local culture. Foreigners often drink and eat fast food, whcih makes public places full of rubbish. Besides, drunken teenagers are often responsible for hanging around and vandalizing lots of social constructions. Take Barcelona, one of the most sites for tourists, for an outstanding example. Due to sightseers' bad behaviours, the landscapes of this country have been damaged by littering, spitting and so on. Therefore, it is normal to understand why they want to ban some areas.
On the flip side, tourism is considered to make a great contribution to the National growth. It is clear that countries which have well-developed country all over the world, its tourism accounts for about 70 percent of the National Economy. Moreover, by enhancing tourism industry, there will be a high probability where people can left unemployment for a long term since tourism give them a golden opportunity for local resident, hotels, shops and so on to earn more money. In other words, society can be benefited by this way. That is why tourism is becoming an indispensable part for the state and community.
To sum up, each side has it positive effects but I think people should not ban some areas because local culture can be altered into a better way and tourism can make countries develop quickly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, as to, i think, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10309278351 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83563255527 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632302405498 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8546689242 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332530566525 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951499705234 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955844123992 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212229860674 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729768956009 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.