Technological developments have altered the way people live. In earlier times, majority of people listened radio to be informed about economical and political issues whereas in today's world, there there are innumreable smart televisions which are cutting edge of computer technology to watch news. Despite many individuals state that radio is still the most convenient way to be update, I would argue that watching news is more effective way to be aware of world wide problems. This essay will discuss both sides.
On the one hand, radios can be the cheapest and the most convenient way to get news. Majority of vehicles hold radio consequently truck drivers and holiday makers can get vital information while traveling. The cost of radios is akso relatively less affluent than any other media sources thus many people are able to afford one. For example, although a mild winter was predicted in Istanbul last year, it was chilly and average temperature was below zero. Due to thunderstorm people could not use smartphones and other technological gadgets while conventional radios were still working and local authorities informed citizens via it during ten days. If they had not been warned about detrimental consequences of it, many people would have died.
On the other hand, it is obvious that televisions leave strong impressions on audience mind due to visual images, and thus it is the most effecetive way of media. Many people are affected deeply when they see tear-jerking scenes. For instance, more than $ 8 million dollar was donated by viewers after a videoclip which showed damage of Irina earthquake had been broadcasted.
In my opinion, I would argue that television is the best way to get information given the fact that it is easy to forget things which are listened in many cases while it is comparatively difficult to forget what are seen. For example, earthquake precautions were examined deeply after 1999 Kocaeli earthquake on MAN television despite I was seven years old. I still remember professionals suggestions and its implications clearly. Therefore, watching them will make people remember it in later times.
By way of conclusion, although listening to news is seen the most budged friendly and the most accessable way to be informed, I strongly believe that visual images have enourmous effect on people's mind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: there
...litical issues whereas in todays world, there there are innumreable smart televisions which...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 458, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...ws is more effective way to be aware of world wide problems. This essay will discuss both ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 458, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...ws is more effective way to be aware of world wide problems. This essay will discuss both ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$8'.
Suggestion: $8
...jerking scenes. For instance, more than $ 8 million dollar was donated by viewers a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in many cases, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20263157895 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80742495436 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573684210526 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2321874424 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.833333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225231840751 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689528262556 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426899014878 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119906399502 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037886014893 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.