Some people believe that responsibility for the protection of the environment is by a transnational organization, rather than by each individual country. To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is argued that environmental protection is considered to be responsible for the cross-border organization, rather than by each nation. Personally, I completely disagree with this statement because I believe that the government and individual should have environmentally responsible manners.
There are many reasons to explain why the government plays a crucial role in improving environmental degradation. Firstly, the authority should allocate financial resources for alternative energy systems. This is because of increasing greenhouse gas emission released from fossil fuel into the atmosphere; it leads to adverse effects on air pollution. One of the typical consequences of this problem results in many respiratory diseases such as lung cancer. For instance, HCM is being covered with thick smog that reduces visibility as well as causes asthma for citizens. Secondly, it is necessary for the authority to construct the waste treatment technology. Many companies have released their industrial waste into the river and ocean, which affects directly to the living of inhabitants nearby. If the government impose heavy punishments to these company and build the drainage systems, water pollution may be controlled.
There are, however, many ways for individuals are able to protect our environment. Firstly, people also can use environmentally friendly means of transportation such as electric cars, bus, and therefore contribute to the reduction of exhaust fumes from private cars into the air. In addition to this, each one needs to raise awareness of environmental pollution caused by human activities, thus spreading messages to everyone over the world. For example, many green campaigns were held annually, such as World Clock, we can participate in these programs to clean the river and gather littler, this helps us prevent from problems as climate changes, soil degradation.
In conclusion, for many reasons I have mentioned above, I still hold my initial view that both national people and authorities should take responsibility for the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 846, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'these companies'?
Suggestion: this company; these companies
... government impose heavy punishments to these company and build the drainage systems, water p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72668810289 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14927434312 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64308681672 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4357987395 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.733333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157504595435 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558217366817 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715537135053 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124276794103 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918564355093 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.