Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time. This can benefit teenagers and the community as well. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this Modern era, it is imperative to engage the adolescent in such things which will teach them such vital values of life. Moreover, Society has the idea that youth need to go for free work in their leisure time which will give an advantage to both society and teenagers. I agree with the above statement. This essay will further elaborate on the viewpoints with pertinent examples.
To commence with, there are myriads of reasons behind doing unpaid work as teenagers. Firstly, Community work can teach today’s youth some important relationship values. This is because They can get a chance to meet the distinct types of humans and help people are who are deprived and helpless. To elucidate this, Globally, change has been seen in teenagers' behavior after doing some community help. Furthermore, they are more likely to look satisfied and proud of themselves. Also, it gives them a sense of belonging and relation.
On the other hand, there are predominant ways to benefit others. This is largely because civilians and youth can donate their spare clothes and household things so others can use those who are needier. Therefore, they would not get cold and out of resources. Additionally, there is other indispensable work which is picking the trash from the nearby area like plastics and non-recyclable substances. This results in a clean and fresh environment. For instance, Worldwide large portion of environmental cleaning is done by teenagers. This helps them to love their nature and restore the area where well-being live.
To recapitulate this, I reckon that it should be a rudimentary activity for all teenagers, so it will bring revolution in teenagers behavior and society's life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, i reckon, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11870503597 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76825380501 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615107913669 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5805807621 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0555555556 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4444444444 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269558858655 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682164237553 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065424491541 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144184153881 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691379148764 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.