Some people believe that they have right to keep all their earnings and can neglect taxes. Do you agree or disagree with this?
It is often considered by some that, people have the capability to save their income and can be ignore about levy. Although, to some extent, paying tariff for the earned money would be beneficial to the government and nation, I personally agree with the statement. Because, as a matured person has the liability to keep money and seem to be used for genuinely.
Taxation service has been escalating rapidly in terms of income, building, savings ax and so on. Employers have the right to use their savings amount as much as they can affordable for the various purposes. Putting tax on every salary would be fruitless for the employee to cope with the livelihood and sustainable living standards. Make use of levy may lead to mitigation of peoples savings and most presumably, people could not get achievement of works which he offered to the employer. Thereby, ones neglect the tax or limitation of tariff program would have been enhancement of persons work and may have enough savings for not only everyday needs but also for the future. For instance, in major company in Singapore deprive the tax for people who have less than certain amount. Such trend flourish the significant employees works and have the proper saving than other company workers.
Keeping money which we earned by many kinds of work may have self confidence and strength to manage difficulties to the core. Owing to the fact that, people could have ability to manage their money and distributed for the needful matters. Apparently, a matured employee have the power to keep safely the earnings and save for the self and family intentions and needs would be better than often pay tax for the government. Moreover, excessive amount of levy would lead to the government authority to spend money recklessly. Most of the project of the government carried out by the tax from an ordinary peoples and we cannot expect such amount would be disburse authentically. For example, many national government around the world had an account of victim in tax lay.
To conclude, government would ascertain the knowledge of a common man ability to save the money which he earned by many kinds of jobs. Although, taxation is indispensable, once ignoring the tax would may lead to thrive stressful situation and daily lives of a common people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-22 | khushboo choudhary | 78 | view |
- The diagrams below show the present building of a college and the plan for changes to the college site in the future 74
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Most leaders or directors generally belong to an older age group, but some people believe that young leaders are better.to what extend do you agree or dis agree.give your opinion. 84
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere . To what extend do you agree with this view. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ch he offered to the employer. Thereby, ones neglect the tax or limitation of tariff...
^^^^
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ough savings for not only everyday needs but also for the future. For instance, i...
^^
Line 3, column 795, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'flourishes'.
Suggestion: flourishes
...ve less than certain amount. Such trend flourish the significant employees works and hav...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, may, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95348837209 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62450901947 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2019283992 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.5 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170030670217 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611404587794 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552618094462 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109445698551 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05989707321 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.